• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 53 (2025)
Volume Volume 52 (2024)
Volume Volume 51 (2023)
Volume Volume 50 (2022)
Volume Volume 49 (2021)
Volume Volume 48 (2020)
Volume Volume 47 (2019)
Volume Volume 46 (2018)
Volume Volume 45 (2017)
Volume Volume 44 (2016)
Volume Volume 43 (2015)
Volume Volume 42 (2014)
Volume Volume 41 (2013)
Volume Volume 40 (2012)
Volume Volume 39 (2011)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2008)
Volume Volume 35 (2007)
Volume Volume 34 (2006)
Issue No 6
Issue No 5
Issue No 4
Issue No 3
Issue No 2
Issue No 1
El Ghandour, D., El-Ghandour, O., Ramadan, H. (2006). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MOBILE AD HOC NETWORK (MANET) PROTOCOLS ROUTING. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 34(No 3), 843-857. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2006.110566
Dr. Osama El Ghandour; O. El-Ghandour; H. Ramadan. "COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MOBILE AD HOC NETWORK (MANET) PROTOCOLS ROUTING". JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 34, No 3, 2006, 843-857. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2006.110566
El Ghandour, D., El-Ghandour, O., Ramadan, H. (2006). 'COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MOBILE AD HOC NETWORK (MANET) PROTOCOLS ROUTING', JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 34(No 3), pp. 843-857. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2006.110566
El Ghandour, D., El-Ghandour, O., Ramadan, H. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MOBILE AD HOC NETWORK (MANET) PROTOCOLS ROUTING. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2006; 34(No 3): 843-857. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2006.110566

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MOBILE AD HOC NETWORK (MANET) PROTOCOLS ROUTING

Article 14, Volume 34, No 3, May and June 2006, Page 843-857  XML PDF (123.17 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2006.110566
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Dr. Osama El Ghandour email 1; O. El-Ghandour email 2; H. Ramadan email 2
1Electronics & Communications and Computer Engineering Department, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
2Helwan University, Electronics & Communications and Computer Engineering Department, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
Wireless Ad Hoc networks are relatively new and are gaining ground in research due to promises they offer. Wireless Ad hoc networks do not require predefined configuration and have no fixed infrastructure. They are self-organizing and self-configuring networks. Several protocols have been developed that vary in the performance and complexity. Most routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks, such as: Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector Protocol (AODV), Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) are designed without explicity considering quality of service of the generated route. These routing protocols provide the capability for establishing minimum hop paths between nodes on a best effort basis regardless of QoS. In our work, we analyze the performance of these protocols and we present an efficient scheme for support QoS over MANET named Hierarchical Dynamic Source Routing protocol (HDSR). The performance aspects we study are fraction of routing overhead, end-to-end delay and throughput. It was shown via computer simulations that (HDSR) improves these performance aspects in wireless mobile ad hoc networks compare to other protocols.
Keywords
Ad hoc; AODV; DSR; HDSR; QoS
Main Subjects
Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and Electrical power and machines engineering.
Statistics
Article View: 125
PDF Download: 344
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.