Mohammed, B. (2016). THE ORIGINALITY OF THE ARCHITECT BETWEEN THE THOUGHT AND THE METHODOLOGY OF THE REALITY, CRITICAL VIEW. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 44(No 4), 378-402. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2016.117608
Belkassem Youssef Mohammed. "THE ORIGINALITY OF THE ARCHITECT BETWEEN THE THOUGHT AND THE METHODOLOGY OF THE REALITY, CRITICAL VIEW". JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 44, No 4, 2016, 378-402. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2016.117608
Mohammed, B. (2016). 'THE ORIGINALITY OF THE ARCHITECT BETWEEN THE THOUGHT AND THE METHODOLOGY OF THE REALITY, CRITICAL VIEW', JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 44(No 4), pp. 378-402. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2016.117608
Mohammed, B. THE ORIGINALITY OF THE ARCHITECT BETWEEN THE THOUGHT AND THE METHODOLOGY OF THE REALITY, CRITICAL VIEW. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2016; 44(No 4): 378-402. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2016.117608
THE ORIGINALITY OF THE ARCHITECT BETWEEN THE THOUGHT AND THE METHODOLOGY OF THE REALITY, CRITICAL VIEW
Dept.of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University، Assiut, Egypt
Abstract
It is easy to choose more than one research method; but it is difficult to adopt more than one mindset, that is because research method is a way of thinking and turns out from tool to be behavior and reaction; whilst the trend is the belief of that behavior or that reaction. This is what brings us to that hidden submerged area, which this research goes to, it enables the architect out of that duplicate to choose more than a single certain research method, beside his belief of a certain mindset, as an effort to continue development on the architectural field. The problem that is being studied by the research is going around the difficulty of taking a decision that can help the architect in taking the suitable position along with that line which can connect between the two ways of the intellectual approach that affects the development of architecture and its progress, ( Back to the past – or deny it to look for the new ), Which may bring it from time to time to one of the them according his visions and according to the data that is imposed according to its reality through many factors which are imposed compulsory on the field. Here comes the main question of this search which is "What is the mean that ensures the proper functioning of the role of the architect in the issue of the continuation of the architectural evolution in his lived reality, either that was an ideal reality or it was a weak one? Then what is the role of both the reality and originality in the issue of choosing the research method and adaptation of mindset? We will follow a comparative analytical approach to two architects through several axes, which are: (Factors affecting the architecture, professional and practical performance, the level of Culture, the intellectual mindset) to get an answer to the question of research. Of the most important findings of the research, is that the originality of the excellence of the architect (His composition) that is the major motivation for adopting a mindset, while his reality is to be the main player to take more than a research method to go with and keep pace with the architectural evolution march, which has to continue with none stop in an extreme barging dialectic that doesn’t ascertain any or method.
View on SCiNiTO
Top