Gado, N., Mohammed, D., ElSayed, N. (2024). Comparative Review: Laser Scanning and Drone Technology for Heritage Architectural 3D Documentation. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 52(5), 625-640. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2024.301046.1349
Nevine G. Gado; Doaa Abd El Latif Mohammed; Noha A. ElSayed. "Comparative Review: Laser Scanning and Drone Technology for Heritage Architectural 3D Documentation". JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 52, 5, 2024, 625-640. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2024.301046.1349
Gado, N., Mohammed, D., ElSayed, N. (2024). 'Comparative Review: Laser Scanning and Drone Technology for Heritage Architectural 3D Documentation', JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 52(5), pp. 625-640. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2024.301046.1349
Gado, N., Mohammed, D., ElSayed, N. Comparative Review: Laser Scanning and Drone Technology for Heritage Architectural 3D Documentation. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2024; 52(5): 625-640. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2024.301046.1349
Comparative Review: Laser Scanning and Drone Technology for Heritage Architectural 3D Documentation
Architectural Department, Modern Academy for Engineering and Technology-El Maadi, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Innovation documentation procedures are very necessary for the protection of cultural heritage sites in general. This study investigates the capabilities of 3D laser scanning and drone photogrammetry in saving accurate documenting and preserving the delicate features of architectural history. The objective of the study is to establish a definitive plan for choosing the optimal technology, either 3D laser scanning or drone photogrammetry, based on the specific needs and status of a restoration project. That’s by analysing the benefits and limitations of both technology and investigate the potential for integrating them together. As this research aims to determine the most suitable applications for each approach by evaluating their performance in terms of accuracy, resolution, data acquisition speed, and adaptation to varied environmental conditions. The results demonstrate that 3D laser scanning is highly effective in collecting intricate features, whereas drone photogrammetry provides quick coverage of large areas. The study's findings indicate that employing a combined strategy can greatly increase the quality and efficiency of architectural documentation. This, accordingly, leads to enhanced preservation efforts and deeper comprehension of cultural assets.
[1] Choi, Byung-Ha. "Reconsideration of the Athens Charter (1931)." Journal of architectural history 21, no. 4 (2012): 25-36.
[2] Erder, Cevat. "The Venice Charter under Review." Journal of Faculty of Architecture, METU, Ankara 25 (1977): 24-31.
[3] Ikeuchi, Katsushi, and Daisuke Miyazaki, eds. Digitally archiving cultural objects. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
[4] Khalaf, Roha W. "Authenticity or continuity in the implementation of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention? Scrutinizing statements of outstanding universal value, 1978–2019." Heritage 3, no. 2 (2020): 243-274.
[5] (El-Hakim, Sabry F., J-A. Beraldin, Michel Picard, and Guy Godin. "Detailed 3D reconstruction of large-scale heritage sites with integrated techniques." IEEE computer graphics and applications 24, no. 3 (2004): 21-29.
[6] Riveiro, B., J. C. Caamaño, Pedro Arias, and E. Sanz. "Photogrammetric 3D modelling and mechanical analysis of masonry arches: An approach based on a discontinuous model of voussoirs." Automation in Construction 20, no. 4 (2011): 380-388.
[7] Denard, Hugh. "A new introduction to the London Charter." Paradata and transparency in virtual heritage (2012): 57-71.
[8] Historical Land website. Available at: https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/conservation-principles-sustainable-management-historic-environment/conservationprinciplespoliciesandguidanceapril08web/.
[9] Wang, Zeyu, Weiqi Shi, Kiraz Akoglu, Eleni Kotoula, Ying Yang, and Holly Rushmeier. "Cher-ob: A tool for shared analysis and video dissemination." Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) 11, no. 4 (2018): 1-22.
[10] Shan, Jie, and Charles K. Toth, eds. Topographic laser ranging and scanning: principles and processing. CRC press, 2018.
[11] Pribanić, Tomislav, David Bojanić, Kristijan Bartol, and Tomislav Petković. "Can OpenPose Be Used as a 3D Registration Method for 3D Scans of Cultural Heritage Artifacts." In International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 83-96. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.
[12] Giuliano, M. G. "Cultural Heritage: An example of graphical documentation with automated photogrammetric systems." The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40 (2014): 251-255.
[13] Stanco, Filippo, Sebastiano Battiato, and Giovanni Gallo. "Digital imaging for cultural heritage preservation." Analysis, Restoration, and Reconstruction of Ancient Artworks (2011).
[14] Ebrahim, Mostafa Abdel-Bary. "3D laser scanners’ techniques overview." Int J Sci Res 4, no. 10 (2015): 323-331.
[15] Alshawabkeh, Yahya, Mohammad El-Khalili, Eyad Almasri, Fadi Bala’awi, and Amaal Al-Massarweh. "Heritage documentation using laser scanner and photogrammetry. The case study of Qasr Al-Abidit, Jordan." Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 16 (2020): e00133.
[16] Kushwaha, S. K. P., Karun Reuel Dayal, Sachchidanand, S. Raghavendra, Hina Pande, Poonam S. Tiwari, S. Agrawal, and S. K. Srivastava. "3D Digital documentation of a cultural heritage site using terrestrial laser scanner—A case study." In Applications of Geomatics in Civil Engineering: Select Proceedings of ICGCE 2018, pp. 49-58. Springer Singapore, 2020.
[17] Li, Jiaxin, Kaiyuan Li, Fangnan Zhao, Xue Feng, Jingli Yu, Yuhu Li, Xiaolian Chao, Juanli Wang, Bingjie Mai, and Jing Cao. "Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning Technology Assisted Investigation and Extraction of Human Bone Information in Archaeological Sites at Shenna Ruins, China." Coatings 12, no. 10 (2022): 1507.
[18] Wilson, Lyn, Alastair Rawlinson, Adam Frost, and James Hepher. "3D digital documentation for disaster management in historic buildings: Applications following fire damage at the Mackintosh building, The Glasgow School of Art." Journal of Cultural Heritage 31 (2018): 24-32.
[19] Messaoudi, Tommy, Philippe Véron, Gilles Halin, and Livio De Luca. "An ontological model for the reality-based 3D annotation of heritage building conservation state." Journal of Cultural Heritage 29 (2018): 100-112.
[20] Vacca, Giuseppina, Andrea Dessì, and Alessandro Sacco. "The use of nadir and oblique UAV images for building knowledge." ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 6, no. 12 (2017): 393.
[21] Aicardi, Irene, Paolo Dabove, Andrea Maria Lingua, and Marco Piras. "Integration between TLS and UAV photogrammetry techniques for forestry applications." Iforest-Biogeosciences and Forestry 10, no. 1 (2016): 41.
[22] Leichtle, C., Malik, J., & Reindel, M. (2018). UAS-based multispectral imaging for the monitoring of vegetation in urban ecosystems. Remote Sensing, 10(7), 1036.
[23] Liu, Yu, Xinqi Zheng, Gang Ai, Yi Zhang, and Yuqiang Zuo. "Generating a high-precision true digital orthophoto map based on UAV images." ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7, no. 9 (2018): 333.
[24] Duffy, J. P., K. Anderson, A. C. Shapiro, and F. L. Spina Avino. "DeBell, & Glover-Kapfer, P.(2020). Drone technologies for conservation." WWF Conservation