Asker, A., A. Abdou, H., Salah, O. (2025). Dimensional Synthesis of a Minimum Torque Exoskeleton for Spastic Wrist Rehabilitation. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 53(2), 64-77. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.347622.1399
Ahmed Asker; Hesham A. Abdou; Omar Salah. "Dimensional Synthesis of a Minimum Torque Exoskeleton for Spastic Wrist Rehabilitation". JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 53, 2, 2025, 64-77. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.347622.1399
Asker, A., A. Abdou, H., Salah, O. (2025). 'Dimensional Synthesis of a Minimum Torque Exoskeleton for Spastic Wrist Rehabilitation', JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 53(2), pp. 64-77. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.347622.1399
Asker, A., A. Abdou, H., Salah, O. Dimensional Synthesis of a Minimum Torque Exoskeleton for Spastic Wrist Rehabilitation. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2025; 53(2): 64-77. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.347622.1399
Dimensional Synthesis of a Minimum Torque Exoskeleton for Spastic Wrist Rehabilitation
1Smart Engineering Systems Research Center (SESC), School of Engineering & applied science, Nile University.Egypt
2Production Engineering & Mechanical Design Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Egypt
3Mechatronics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
Abstract
Hand mobility and dexterity are crucial for daily activities, yet conditions such as stroke and wrist-related injuries can severely impair these functions. A prevalent post-stroke condition, spasticity, is characterized by high muscle tone and stiffness, making joint flexion significantly more strenuous. This study addresses the substantial torque required for effective wrist rehabilitation in stroke survivors. Our approach involves optimizing the dimensions of a Stephenson III six-bar mechanism to minimize the peak assisting torque, leveraging wrist stiffness data from stroke patients. The genetic algorithm is used to optimize the mechanism dimensions to get a nonlinear angular displacement function between the input and output links. This drastically reduces the required actuation torque. Rigorous validation of the optimized mechanism was conducted using Simscape Multibody dynamics simulation environments. Remarkably, the optimized mechanism achieves a peak actuation torque of just 1.64 N.m when assisting users with typical wrist spasticity, a stark contrast to the 11.69 N.m required when the joint is directly actuated. This research not only offers a promising avenue for developing efficient, lightweight, and cost-effective rehabilitation devices but also holds the potential to significantly enhance the quality of life for individuals with impaired wrist mobility.
[1] Aranceta-Garza, Alejandra, and Karyn Ross. "A comparative study of the efficacy and functionality of 10 commercially available wrist-hand orthoses in healthy females during activities of daily living." Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 3 (2022): 1017354..
[2] Chen, Bei, et al. "Pathophysiology and Management Strategies for Post-Stroke Spasticity: An Update Review." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26.1 (2025): 406.
[3] M. Mirbagheri and K. Settle, “Neuromuscular properties of different spastic human joints vary systematically,” in 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. IEEE, 2010, pp. 4894–4897.
[4] Garcia, Gabriella Faina, Rogério Sales Gonçalves, and Giuseppe Carbone. "A Review of Wrist Rehabilitation Robots and Highlights Needed for New Devices." Machines 12.5 (2024): 315.
[5] M. G. Atia and O. Salah, “Fuzzy logic with load compensation for upper limb exoskeleton control based on imu data fusion,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE, 2018, pp. 2147–2152.
[6] H. El-Hussieny, A. Asker, and O. Salah, “Learning the sit-to-stand human behavior: an inverse optimal control approach,” in 2017 13th international computer engineering conference (ICENCO). IEEE, 2017, pp. 112–117.
[7] F. Aggogeri, T. Mikolajczyk, and J. O’Kane, “Robotics for rehabilitation of hand movement in stroke survivors,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 1687814019841921, 2019.
[8] H. S. Nam, S. Koh, Y. J. Kim, J. Beom, W. H. Lee, S.-U. Lee, and S. Kim, “Biomechanical reactions of exoskeleton neurorehabilitation robots in spastic elbows and wrists,” IEEE Transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2196–2203, 2017.
[9] T. Nef, M. Mihelj, and R. Riener, “Armin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy,” Medical & biological engineering & computing, vol. 45, pp. 887–900, 2007.
[10] D. J. Lee, S. J. Bae, S. H. Jang, and P. H. Chang, “Design of a clinically relevant upper-limb exoskeleton robot for stroke patients with spasticity,” in 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). IEEE, 2017, pp. 622–627.
[11] E. Gezgin, P.-H. Chang, and A. F. Akhan, “Synthesis of a watt ii six-bar linkage in the design of a hand rehabilitation robot,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 104, pp. 177–189, 2016.
[12] A. Bataller, J. Cabrera, M. Clavijo, and J. Castillo, “Evolutionary synthesis of mechanisms applied to the design of an exoskeleton for finger rehabilitation,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 105, pp. 31–43, 2016.
[13] M. M. Plecnik and J. M. McCarthy, “Kinematic synthesis of stephenson III six-bar function generators,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 97, pp. 112–126, 2016.
[14] T. R. Chase and J. A. Mirth, “Circuits and branches of single-degree-of-freedom planar linkages,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 223–230, 06 1993.
[15] R. L. Norton, Design of machinery. McGraw-Hill New York, 2020.
[16] A. Asker and S. F. Assal, “Kinematic analysis of a parallel manipulator-based multifunction mobility assistive device for elderly,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). IEEE, 2015, pp. 676–681.
[17] A. Asker, S. Xie, and A. A. Dehghani-Sanij, “Multi-objective optimization of force transmission quality and joint misalignment of a 5-bar knee exoskeleton,” in 2021 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM). IEEE, 2021, pp. 122–127.
[18] V. K. Pathak, R. Singh, A. Sharma, R. Kumar, and D. Chakraborty, “A historical review on the computational techniques for mechanism synthesis: Developments up to 2022,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1131–1156, 2023.
View on SCiNiTO
Top