• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 53 (2025)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 52 (2024)
Volume Volume 51 (2023)
Volume Volume 50 (2022)
Volume Volume 49 (2021)
Volume Volume 48 (2020)
Volume Volume 47 (2019)
Volume Volume 46 (2018)
Volume Volume 45 (2017)
Volume Volume 44 (2016)
Volume Volume 43 (2015)
Volume Volume 42 (2014)
Volume Volume 41 (2013)
Volume Volume 40 (2012)
Volume Volume 39 (2011)
Volume Volume 38 (2010)
Volume Volume 37 (2009)
Volume Volume 36 (2008)
Volume Volume 35 (2007)
Volume Volume 34 (2006)
Shokry, R. (2025). Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Urban Design. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 53(4), 457-473. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.370145.1459
Rania Shokry. "Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Urban Design". JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 53, 4, 2025, 457-473. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.370145.1459
Shokry, R. (2025). 'Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Urban Design', JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 53(4), pp. 457-473. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.370145.1459
Shokry, R. Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Urban Design. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2025; 53(4): 457-473. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.370145.1459

Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Urban Design

Article 10, Volume 53, Issue 4, July and August 2025, Page 457-473  XML PDF (841.36 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.370145.1459
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Rania Shokry email orcid
Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology, Fifth Settlement, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) within the built environment is driving a paradigm shift—enhancing innovation, streamlining processes, and promoting sustainability—while simultaneously redefining conventional design methodologies. This study explores the benefits and limitations of three AI-driven applications in the context of urban design: PlanFinder, TestFit, and Luma.
PlanFinder demonstrates exceptional capability in generating diverse design alternatives within seconds, thereby accelerating workflows for both novice and experienced designers. TestFit supports urban design by producing site-specific solutions that align with cost parameters and regulatory requirements, empowering planners and developers to make data-driven decisions. Meanwhile, Luma enhances visualization by transforming simple architectural models into highly realistic 3D animations, significantly improving communication and presentation quality.
While these applications offer substantial advantages—including time efficiency, cost reduction, and expanded creative potential—they also pose notable challenges. These include dependence on accurate input data, limited flexibility for manual modifications, and integration difficulties with complex or unconventional project demands. Furthermore, the adoption of AI raises ethical considerations, particularly regarding its influence on employment within the design and urban design sectors.
This research employs a structured methodology using real-world case studies to evaluate three AI-powered design tools—PlanFinder, TestFit, and Luma—based on their accuracy, speed, usability, flexibility, output quality, and software integration, and provides critical insights for architects, urban planners, and educators aiming to adopt AI tools in their workflows. It serves as a practical guide to understanding the capabilities, constraints, and future implications of artificial intelligence in the built environment.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence; Urban Design; AI Tools PlanFinder; TestFit; and Luma
Main Subjects
Architecture Engineering and the Engineering Architectural Interior Design.
References
 

  1. Ko, J., Ennemoser, B., Yoo, W., Yan, W., & Clayton, M. J. (2023). Architectural spatial layout planning using artificial intelligence. Automation in Construction. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580523002790
  2. Jaruga-Rozdolska, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence as part of future practices in the architect’s work: MidJourney generative tool as part of a process of creating an architectural form. Architectus. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2174415.pdf
  3. Yussuf, R. O., & Asfour, O. S. (2024). Applications of artificial intelligence for energy efficiency throughout the building lifecycle: An overview. Energy and Buildings. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778824000197
  4. Almaz, A. F., El-Agouz, E. A. E., Abdelfatah, M. T., & Mohamed, I. R. (2024). The future role of AI design integration in architectural and interior design education: Improving efficiency, sustainability, and creativity. Sustainability and Creativity. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379665362_The_Future_Role_of_AI_Design_Integration
  5. Liang, C. J., Le, T. H., Ham, Y., Mantha, B. R. K., Cheng, M. H., & Lin, J. J. (2024). Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Automation in Construction. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580524001055
  6. Jiang, F., Ma, J., Webster, C., Chiaradia, A., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Generative urban design: A systematic review on problem formulation, design generation, and decision-making. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305900623000569
  7. Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT, Bard, and leading-edge generative artificial intelligence in architectural design and engineering: Applications, framework, and challenges. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4645595
  8. Cudzik, J., Nyka, L., & Szczepański, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in architectural education: Green campus development research. Global Journal of Engineering Education. https://mostwiedzy.pl/pl/publication/download/1/artificial-intelligence-in-architectural-education
  9. Verganti, R., Vendraminelli, L., & Iansiti, M. (2020). Innovation and design in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(3), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12523
  10. He, W., & Chen, M. (2024). Advancing urban life: A systematic review of emerging applications and artificial intelligence in urban design and planning. Buildings, 14(3), 835. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/3/835
  11. Ertel, W. (2024). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Springer Nature. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=O7kfEQAAQBAJ
  12. Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K. M. I., Alonso-Moral, J. M., & Confalonieri, R. (2023). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain trustworthy artificial intelligence. Information Fusion. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253523001148
  13. Schwendicke, F., Arsiwala-Scheppach, L. T., & Krois, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence: What it is and what it can do for dentists. Dental Update, 50(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2023.50.4.245
  14. Plan Finder. (n.d.). AI-based architectural design generator. https://www.planfinder.xyz/
  15. Test Fit. (n.d.). Real estate feasibility platform. https://www.testfit.io/
 

Statistics
Article View: 92
PDF Download: 188
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.