Mahmoud, R. (2024). Requirements for Achieving the Social Benefits of Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI). JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 52(5), 498-532. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2024.289935.1336
Rehab AFAA Mahmoud. "Requirements for Achieving the Social Benefits of Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI)". JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 52, 5, 2024, 498-532. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2024.289935.1336
Mahmoud, R. (2024). 'Requirements for Achieving the Social Benefits of Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI)', JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 52(5), pp. 498-532. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2024.289935.1336
Mahmoud, R. Requirements for Achieving the Social Benefits of Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI). JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2024; 52(5): 498-532. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2024.289935.1336
Requirements for Achieving the Social Benefits of Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI)
مدرس بقسم الهندسة المعماریة، کلیة الهندسة، مصر، جامعة سیناء، فرع القنطرة
Abstract
The rapid transformation of urban neighborhoods, alongside changing lifestyles, has prompted cities to prioritize not only mitigating climate stress but also improving the well-being of their residents. According to a study reported in the 2022 World Urbanization Prospects, cities emit greenhouse gases ranging from 40% to 70%. There is a possibility that these proportions could increase to 60% and 70% if the shrinkage of open and green spaces continues significantly, and public places become the available alternatives for people to interact socially away from their overcrowded homes. Therefore, research is focusing on studying the implementation of Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI) in cities and the resulting social benefits. The research aims to propose a set of requirements that must be met to achieve the social benefits of urban green infrastructure. This will serve as a reference for urban planners and any institution involved in creating open public spaces to enhance the capabilities of workers before and after the implementation of urban green infrastructure projects. The research addresses the concept and evolution of Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI), including its components, planning methodologies, obstacles, and strategies. The research also presents an analytical study of global projects in this field. The research concludes that integrating central green areas, corridors, and stepping stones with urban green infrastructure strategies helps to achieve social benefits for and with the community.
1. Nations, U., World Urbanization Prospects 2009 Revision (United Nations 2010). Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, March 2010.
2. Davies, C. and R. Lafortezza, Urban green infrastructure in Europe: Is greenspace planning and policy compliant? Land Use Policy, 2017. 69: p. 93-101.
3. European and Commission, Green Infrastructure (GI) - Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital. Brussels, 2013. COM(2013) 249 final.
4. Rieke Hansen, E.L.R., Werner Rolf, Urban Green Infrastructure Planning -A Guide for Practitioners. the EU FP7 project "GREEN SURGE", September 2017.
5. McMahon, M.A.B.a.E.T., Green Infrastructure: Smart Conservation for the 21st Century. Reprinted from Renewable Resources Journal, 2002. Volume 20, Number3, Pages 12–17.
6. Graham Tucker, L.M., GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFICIENCY. This report is submitted by: Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), FINAL REPORT -22 December 2011. ENV.B.2/SER/2010/0059.
7. Business, E., Sustainability, reen infrastructure is a planning and development technique for urban cities, community spaces, or individual buildings utilizing sustainable materials. March 12, 2021.
8. Grant, L., A CIWEM Briefing Report: Multi-Functional Urban Green Infrastructure. The Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management (CIWEM), May 2010.
9. Bartel, S.O., John, The dominant role of animal social status in vertebrate seed dispersal. National Center for Biotechnology Information advances science and health 2022 May. 10.1111/ele.13988: p. 25(5):1094-1109. .
10. Ahern, J., Green infrastructure for cities: The spatial dimension. IWA Publishing, London, UK. Pg. 270-271., May 14, 2007.
11. WELLS, N.M., At Home with Nature: Effects of “Greenness” on Children’s Cognitive Functioning. Environment and Behavior, 2000. 32((6)): p. 775–795.
12. Momen, M., Governance on the Ground: Innovations and Discontinuities in Cities of the Developing World. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 2005. 25(1): p. 275-277.
13. Arbuthnott, K.G.H., S., The health effects of hotter summers and heat waves in the population of the United Kingdom: a review of the evidence. Environ Health, 2017. 16(Suppl 1): p. 119.
15. David Coghlan, V.J.F., Davydd J. Greenwood, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research. SAGE Publications. Introduction and editorial arrangement by David Coghlan and Mary Brydon-Miller, 2014, 2020.
16. LAURA L. PAYNE, A.J.M., ELIZABETH, An Examination of Park Preferences and Behaviors
Among Urban Residents: The Role of Residential
Location, Race, and Age. Leisure Sciences, 2002. 24(2): p. 181-198.
17. Ann Van Herzele, S.d.V., Linking green space to health: A comparative study of two urban neighbourhoods in Ghent, Belgium. Population and environment, 2012. 34(2): p. 171-193.
18. Zhang, J.W., et al., An occasion for unselfing: Beautiful nature leads to prosociality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014. 37: p. 61-72.
19. El Kaftangui, M. and M. Razem, Place Attachment and Sustainable Communities. Architecture_MPS, 2020. 17(1).
20. Withagen, R. and S.R. Caljouw, Aldo van Eyck's Playgrounds: Aesthetics, Affordances, and Creativity. Front Psychol, 2017. 8: p. 1130.
21. Ellery, P.J. and J. Ellery, Strengthening Community Sense of Place through Placemaking. Urban Planning, 2019. 4(2): p. 237-248.
23. Pomeranz, E.F. and R.C. Stedman, Measuring good governance: piloting an instrument for evaluating good governance principles. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2020. 22(3): p. 428-440.
24. Meerkerk, I.V., Top-down versus bottom-up pathways to collaboration between governments and citizens: reflecting on different participation traps. September 2019.
25. Parker, J. and M.E. Zingoni de Baro, Green Infrastructure in the Urban Environment: A Systematic Quantitative Review. Sustainability, 2019. 11(11).
26. Wesener, A., et al., Placemaking in Action: Factors That Support or Obstruct the Development of Urban Community Gardens. Sustainability, 2020. 12(2).
27. Mark Wyckoff, B.N., Glenn Pape and Kurt Schindler, Placemaking as an Economic Development Tool. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, May 31, 2015.
28. Korosec, R.L. and E.M. Berman, Municipal Support for Social Entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 2006. 66(3): p. 448-462.
29. Werner Rolf, R.H., Emily Rall und Stephan Pauleit, Main Principles for Urban Green Infrastructure Planning. Green surge Work Package 5, 25.10.2016.
30. Luca Száraz, É.G., Szeged, Case Study City Portrait; part of a GREEN SURGE study on urban green infrastructure planning and governance in 20 European cities. City Hall of Szeged, January 2014.
31. Austin, G., CASE STUDY AND SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF Bo01, MALMÖ, SWEDEN. Green Building, Brazil December 2020. Volume 8, Number 3.
32. Engineers, A.S.o.C., THE NEW ORLEANS HURRICANE PROTECTION SYSTEM:
What Went Wrong and Why. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data, USA., 2007.
34. EPA, Green Infrastructure and Climate Change: Collaborating to Improve Community Resiliency. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wastewater Management, USA, August 1, 2017.
35. Dana Brown & Associates, I., RichaRd Lee PaRk StRategic PLan Complete projeCt report. 2017.
44. Jafri, P.S., Green Infrastructure and Community Enhancement in Stoepel Park No. 1 Project Overview. Copyright 2001-2024 by City of Detroit, 2016.
45. Agency, E.E., Nature-based solutions in Europe: Policy, knowledge and practice for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021, 2021. EEA Report 01.
46. MARY_KINCAID, City of New Orleans Resilience Design Review Committee. Feb 22, 2022.
47. Depietri, Y.M., Timon, Integrating the Grey, Green, and Blue in Cities: Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Change Adaptation and Risk Reduction, in Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas. 2017. p. 91-109.
48. Harnik, P., Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities. April 15, 2010: Washington, DC : Island Press.
49. Bjögvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P.-A. Hillgren, Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues, 2012. 28(3): p. 101-116.
50. Wolch, J.R., J. Byrne, and J.P. Newell, Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014. 125: p. 234-244.
51. Thomas T.J.Mattijssen, A.S.O., Maja Steen Møller, Natalie Gulsrud, Ole Hjorth Caspersen., URBAN GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE: CONNECTING PEOPLE AND NATURE FOR SUSTAINABLE CITIES. University of Copenhagen, September 2017.
View on SCiNiTO
Top