Evaluation of Asphalt Overlay Properties on Reflection Cracking Behavior of Composite Pavement Using Finite Element Modeling

Gamal, Mohamed; Enieb, Mahmoud; Abd Alla, El-Sayed

doi:10.21608/jesaun.2024.320186.1367

Home Articles List Article Information

|
|
|
How to cite
RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
|
Share

Articles in Press

Current Issue

Journal Archive

Volume 53 (2025)

Issue 6

Issue 5

Issue 4

Issue 3

Issue 2

Issue 1

Volume 52 (2024)

Volume 51 (2023)

Volume 50 (2022)

Volume 49 (2021)

Volume 48 (2020)

Volume 47 (2019)

Volume 46 (2018)

Volume 45 (2017)

Volume 44 (2016)

Volume 43 (2015)

Volume 42 (2014)

Volume 41 (2013)

Volume 40 (2012)

Volume 39 (2011)

Volume 38 (2010)

Volume 37 (2009)

Volume 36 (2008)

Volume 35 (2007)

Volume 34 (2006)

	Evaluation of Asphalt Overlay Properties on Reflection Cracking Behavior of Composite Pavement Using Finite Element Modeling
Article 2, Volume 53, Issue 1, January and February 2025, Page 23-37 PDF (1.63 MB)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2024.320186.1367
View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed Gamal ¹; Mahmoud Enieb ²; El-Sayed Abd Alla²
¹Civil Engineering Dept., Al-Safwa Higher Institute of Engineering, Cairo, Egypt
²Professor, Civil Engineering Dept., Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Abstract
Reflective cracking poses a significant challenge to the performance and durability of Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) overlays, particularly when applied over deteriorated Joint Plain Concrete (JPC) pavements. This study explores the effects of reflective cracking on overlay pavements through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) using ABAQUS, integrating the Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) to simulate crack initiation and propagation. Key factors analysed include overlay thickness, modulus of elasticity, JPC joint width, and fracture areas within the pavement structure. The results indicate that increasing overlay thickness from 30 mm to 100 mm reduces tensile strain by up to 68.8%, significantly improving stress dissipation. Variations in the modulus of elasticity (ranging from 1500 Mpa to 6000 Mpa) were found to reduce tensile strain by approximately 37.5%. Additionally, the number of load repetitions required to cause reflective cracking increases with overlay thickness: 11,220 repetitions for 30 mm, 226,458 repetitions for 60 mm, and 458,835 repetitions for 100 mm. Wider JPC joints (from 6 mm to 20 mm) increased stress concentrations and crack severity. The study also quantified fracture behavior using the Representative Fracture Area (RFA), with RFA increasing by up to 99% under higher load repetitions. These findings provide practical recommendations for pavement design, particularly in selecting optimal overlay thicknesses and material properties to extend the lifespan of rehabilitated pavements and mitigate reflective cracking.
Keywords
Pavement Modeling; Finite Elements Analysis; Reflection Cracking
Main Subjects
Civil Engineering: structural, Geotechnical, reinforced concrete and steel structures, Surveying, Road and traffic engineering, water resources, Irrigation structures, Environmental and sanitary engineering, Hydraulic, Railway, construction Management.


References
[1] Y. S. Ajool, A. A. Allawi, and A. H. Kalil, "Mitigation of Reflection Cracking in Asphalt Concrete Overlay on Rigid Pavements," in E3S Web of Conferences, 2023, vol. 427: EDP Sciences, p. 03004. [2] A. O. Diallo and M. V. Akpinar, "Mechanistic Responses of Asphalt Concrete Overlay Over Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement Using Finite Element Method," The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 80-93, 2020. [3] Z. Ghauch and G. Abou-Jaoude, "Strain response of hot-mix asphalt overlays in jointed plain concrete pavements due to reflective cracking," Computers & Structures, vol. 124, pp. 38-46, 2013. [4] F.-L. Tsai, R. L. Lytton, and S. Lee, "Prediction of reflection cracking in hot-mix asphalt overlays," Transportation Research Record, vol. 2155, no. 1, pp. 43-54, 2010. [5] [M. A. S. Hadi and M. H. Al-Sherrawi, "The Influence of Base Layer Thickness in Flexible Pavements," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 7904-7909, 2021. [6] A. H. Albayati, Y. S. Ajool, and A. A. Allawi, "Comparative Analysis of Reinforced Asphalt Concrete Overlays: Effects of Thickness and Temperature," Materials, vol. 16, no. 17, p. 5990, 2023. [7] J. Baek, Modeling reflective cracking development in hot-mix asphalt overlays and quantification of control techniques. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010. [8] M. R. Taha, S. Hardwiyono, N. I. M. Yusoff, M. R. Hainin, J. Wu, and K. A. M. Nayan, "Study of the effect of temperature changes on the elastic modulus of flexible pavement layers," Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1661-1667, 2013. [9] J. Baek and I. L. Al-Qadi, "Mechanism of overlay reinforcement to retard reflective cracking under moving vehicular loading," Pavement Cracking Mechanisms, Modeling, Detection, Testing and Case Histories, pp. 563-573, 2008. [10] L. Guo, J. Yue, P. Guo, and X. Wang, "Multiple Reflective Cracks in Semirigid Base Asphalt Pavement under Traffic Load Using XFEM," Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2022, 2022. [11] M. Rith and S. W. Lee, "Development of cohesive-zone-based prediction model for reflective cracking in asphalt overlay," International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1050-1059, 2022. [12] A. International. "ASTM D7313-13: Standard test method for determining fracture energy of asphalt-aggregate mixtures using the disk-shaped compact tension geometry." https://www.astm.org/d7313-13.html (accessed. [13] S. H. Song, G. H. Paulino, and W. G. Buttlar, "A bilinear cohesive zone model tailored for fracture of asphalt concrete considering viscoelastic bulk material," Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 73, no. 18, pp. 2829-2848, 2006. [14] C. Du, Y. Sun, J. Chen, H. Gong, X. Wei, and Z. Zhang, "Analysis of cohesive and adhesive damage initiations of asphalt pavement using a microstructure-based finite element model," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 261, p. 119973, 2020. [15] N. Han, L. Fan, and Y. Zhang, "Estimation of cohesive zone model parameters for glass/Elium composites with different processing temperature," Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 43, no. 11-12, pp. 601-611, 2024. [16] M. A. Elseifi, J. Baek, and N. Dhakal, "Review of modelling crack initiation and propagation in flexible pavements using the finite element method," International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 251-263, 2018. [17] B. Ding, X. Zou, Z. Peng, and X. Liu, "Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures Using the Single‐Edge Notched Beams," Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2018, no. 1, p. 8026798, 2018. [18] R. L. Lytton, F. L. Tsai, S. I. Lee, R. Luo, S. Hu, and F. Zhou, "Models for predicting reflection cracking of hot-mix asphalt overlays," NCHRP report, vol. 669, pp. 48-56, 2010. [19] K.-H. Tseng and R. L. Lytton, "Fatigue damage properties of asphaltic concrete pavements," Transportation Research Record, no. 1286, 1990. [20] A. Nega and H. Nikraz, "Evaluation of tire-pavement contact stress distribution of pavement response and some effects on the flexible pavements," Airfield and Highway Pavements 2017: Pavement Innovation and Sustainability, pp. 174-185, 2017.
Statistics Article View: 365 PDF Download: 395